The Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported on Sunday, "the representatives of the main political actors of Venezuela have decided to continue the negotiation process facilitated by Norway". It added "the parties will meet this week in [the island of] Barbados to advance in the search for an agreed and constitutional solution for the country. Negotiations will be carried out continuously and expeditiously".

It is the third time in eight weeks that the delegations of Nicolás Maduro and Juan Guaidó have met. So far, the advance of Norway's "peaceful solution" has been almost zero, because Maduro and Guaidó have different objectives, the advancement of parliamentary elections and the "cessation of usurpation", respectively.

However, on this occasion, the strength that Maduro had for exercising a de facto government and controlling the Venezuelan territory diminished after the devastating report of the high commissioner of the United Nations Organization for Human Rights on Venezuela, which establishes that "the command" of Maduro is thanks to "the violation of human rights" of Venezuelans and "the violence of the State". In other words, the report describes Maduro as the deadliest dictator. It is "a clinical case of cruelty to the whole world".

This condition of deadliest dictator causes Maduro to lose the support of the foremost leaders of "democratic socialism". He needs a lifesaver to recover "the sheepskin". For what it resorts to Norway and concepts and behaviors such as "independence and sovereignty, strict adherence to democratic norms and the Constitution".

On the day that Michelle Bachelet published her report, Vladimir Putin met with Pope Francis - the theology of liberation - in the Vatican. They talked about the situation in Venezuela, among other issues. And a week before, Putin and Trump also discussed the case of Venezuela in Osaka, Japan, at the G20 summit.

Also, at the end of May, Elliott Abrams, special envoy of the United States government for Venezuela, traveled to Rome to meet with Pietro Parolin, Secretary of State of the Holy See, to align the strategy of the negotiation in Oslo with the mediation of Norway. And, on June 14, meetings were held in Stockholm between "key actors" to overcome the crisis in Venezuela through "a peaceful, political and democratic solution". One of the participants was the Russian Chancellery.

The situation in Venezuela is unsustainable, unstable and unacceptable, so the international allies of Maduro and Guaidó decided to choose "the peaceful, political and democratic solution" of Norway for the exit of the crisis.

The Spanish newspaper El Mundo noted, "the Norwegians assure the democratic opposition that Maduro already accepted the call for presidential elections with guarantees. However, the main stumbling block, according to legislators with direct knowledge of the talks, is that the 'people's president' does not want to leave power in the months leading up to the elections".

In this sense, Norway emphasizes "the one who governs", the reason for being of the history of Venezuelan politics since its foundation as a Republic.

The great crises (economic, human, security, services) that Venezuela is going through and which affects the majority of Venezuelans (80%) require a national agreement, to establish the bases of the what and how of the Venezuela of the 21st century, "productive democracy", which includes the private sector, trade unions, universities, social organizations together with the political actors, among others.

The current situation allows us to reach this agreement through Transformative Scenario Planning because the Bachelet report "evicted Maduro regime" and its international allies were left without the "revolutionary cliché" that the American imperialism causes the crisis.

Consequently, Russia, China, and the United States - for other reasons - expect to see "white smoke" in Barbados, in terms of the "peaceful, political and democratic" solution to the crisis in Venezuela. Otherwise, it will once again face the great powers in support of Maduro in power. And, the report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights will be left aside.



English

Latest publications
Trump 2.0 vs Maduro: negociar o perder
Politics, 12/Nov/2024
Venezuela ante un triunfo de Kamala o Trump
Politics, 5/Nov/2024
Elección estadounidense: una guerra de valores
Politics, 31/Oct/2024
El aislamiento de Maduro
Politics, 29/Oct/2024
Maduro y la estrategia de poder bajo fuego
Politics, 22/Oct/2024
Es hora de elegir la soberanía popular
Politics, 21/Oct/2024
Venezuela en un equilibrio inestable
Politics, 1/Oct/2024
A dos meses del triunfo de la soberanía popular
Politics, 27/Sep/2024
La coordinación es la clave para el cambio en Venezuela
Breaking Venezuela’s stalemate: strategic coordination to overcome Maduro’s regime
Politics, 24/Sep/2024
Chevron y Biden-Harris ante el dilema de mantener a Maduro
Chevron and Biden-Harris: the dilemma of keeping Maduro in power
Politics, 17/Sep/2024
Represión vs. Resistencia latente
Venezuela’s turning point: breaking the cycle of repression
Politics, 10/Sep/2024
La guerra silenciosa en Venezuela: un juego de estrategia al límite
Politics, 10/Sep/2024
En Venezuela, la inacción no es una opción
Politics, 28/Aug/2024
Más allá de las negociaciones, el rol de la comunidad internacional
Politics, 25/Aug/2024
Democracia y justicia ante el régimen criminal de Miraflores
Politics, 16/Aug/2024
El desafío democrático en Venezuela
The democratic challenge in Venezuela
Politics, 10/Aug/2024
Latest events
Children of Misery: Guns and Gangs in Central America
Hudson Institute - Center for Latin American Studies
September 10, 2014
Beyond Hugo Chávez: What to expect in Latin America
Hudson Institute - Center for Latin American Studies
May 8, 2013
XIV Seminario de Estrategias de Campañas Electorales - De la práctica a la práctica
The George Washington University - The Graduate School of Political Management
March 11 to 15, 2013